Spy ships, nuclear submarines, landing ships and frigates. Danish Rockwool has systematically and deliberately supplied the Russian navy with hundreds of thousands of square meters of ship insulation used in some of the most advanced vessels in the Russian navy.
This is revealed by a comprehensive review of Russia’s official tender database, which Danwatch and Ekstra Bladet have conducted over several months.
In total, there is evidence that since Russia’s illegal annexation of Crimea in 2014, Rockwool ship insulation has been sold at least 52 times to a total of 31 different vessels in Putin’s fleet. These include two destroyers, two submarines that can be equipped with nuclear weapons, two landing ships, three frigates, six minesweepers and five reconnaissance vessels – in other words, warships and spy ships at the very heavy end of the Russian naval arsenal.
Together, the list represents a sizable portion of Russia’s active fleet, which in July 2023 is estimated to consist of 297 warships, submarines and other military vessels.
In 29 of the cases, sales were made through Rockwool’s official partner and distributor, Marine Complex Systems LLC (MKS), a company that specialises in servicing the Russian military.
To better understand the type of vessels Rockwool has supplied insulation to, we asked Commander and Military Analyst at the Centre for Military Studies at the University of Copenhagen, Jens Wenzel Kristoffersen, to comment on their role in the Russian navy:
Several of the ships have since played a role in the current war in Ukraine. This applies to the six ships belonging to the Black Sea Fleet, but for example, the landing ship “Pyotr Morgunov” from the Northern Fleet, to which MKS supplied Rockwool products worth 48 million rubles (approx. DKK 4.5 million at the time) in 2018, has also been directly involved in the war.
An EU regulation from March 2022 states that the 135-metre-long ship is equipped with an AK-630 cannon and heavy machine gun, among other things:
“The large landing ship “Pyotr Morgunov” project 11711, built by United Shipbuilding Corporation, participated in the illegal Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022.”
Ukrainian military analyst Alexander Kovalenko also confirms to Danwatch and Ekstra Bladet that “Pyotr Morgunov” has played an important role during the war:
“It has been in the Black Sea since the beginning of the invasion of Ukraine. ‘Pyotr Morgunov’ has provided transportation of ammunition, personnel and equipment and has also participated in the mining of the Black Sea,” he says.
The market for selling insulation to warships is something of which the renowned Danish company has been fully aware. In an official promotional booklet from 2015, which Rockwool translated and distributed in Russia, highlights warships as one of the most common applications for Rockwool’s marine insulation.
Rockwool’s Head of Communications, Michael Zarin, writes in a response to Danwatch and Ekstra Bladet that they are aware that insulation products in “certain cases have been used in Russian naval vessels” and that they have been sold through the Russian subsidiaries’ external distributors.
“Neither ROCKWOOL A/S nor our Russian subsidiaries sell directly to Russian end users and nor do they have a customer relationship with the Russian military,” Michael Zarin writes, among other things.
Rockwool does not want to comment on why the company in Russia continues to work with MKS, which as a company is specialised in servicing the Russian navy. Neither do they want to answer questions about whether the group makes special demands on their distributors in Russia in relation to the end use of their products.
According to Jens Wenzel Kristoffersen, a naval captain and military analyst at the Centre for Military Studies at the University of Copenhagen, the number of Russian naval ships with Rockwool is collectively capable of posing “a threat to allied forces at sea, on land and in the air.”
“The collection of ships is assessed to pose a military threat to allied naval vessels, including in relation to special operations, retrieval missions, monitoring, mapping of critical infrastructure and finally in crisis and war situations,” he says.
He particularly highlights the large ships such as the battlecruiser “Admiral Nakhimov” and the two destroyers “Marshal Shaposhnikov” and “Admiral Chabanenko”, all of which, despite being many years old, can still play a major role in future missions.
“Especially the larger units, regardless of age or whether they have undergone midlife updates, as well as the latest nuclear units, pose a particular threat in the Atlantic and to NATO allies,” says Jens Wenzel Kristoffersen.
Professor Michael Petersen, head of the Russia Maritime Studies Institute at the US Naval War College and a former member of both US military intelligence and the National Security Council, also believes that the many concrete warships are of great importance to Russia’s military.
He emphasises that Russia’s navy has undergone a large-scale modernisation in the years before and after the illegal annexation of Crimea in 2014, and according to him, Danwatch and Ekstra Bladet’s list of naval vessels insulated with Rockwool reflects exactly that development.
“The complete list provides an interesting and concrete insight into the Russian navy’s priorities for the construction and modernisation of surface ships. They reflect an emphasis on power projection, intelligence gathering and coastal defense,” he says.
“In particular, the construction of Project 22350 Gorshkov-class missile frigates is the primary focus in restoring the Russian surface fleet’s global presence and military power. They have carried out Russia’s highest-profile peacetime naval missions, including the first circumnavigation of the globe by a Russian warship since the nineteenth century in 2019.”
Back in February this year, the Danish Business Authority initiated an investigation when Danwatch and Ekstra Bladet first revealed Rockwool’s connections to the Russian military.
At the time, it specifically concerned 5 ships equipped with Rockwool insulation, and the Danish Business Authority did not believe there was reason to assume that Rockwool had violated the EU sanctions introduced in connection with the annexation of Crimea.
Tara Van Ho, one of the world’s leading experts on human rights and business at Essex Law School in the UK, emphasises that even if companies are found not to have breached sanctions, they are still obliged to comply with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs), which are designed to ensure that companies do not contribute to human rights abuses at any stage of their value chain.
“Rockwool has been behind a kind of systematic practice that is really worrying from a UNGP perspective. It suggests that there is a bigger problem with Rockwool’s screening processes,” she says.
“Many or all of these sales may be technically compliant with EU sanctions, but Rockwool was still supplying the Russian military through their official distributors with products necessary for the military’s activities.”
“As soon as Russia invaded Crimea, those sales should have been investigated more thoroughly – what we call enhanced human rights due diligence. That Rockwool continued to allow these sales raises the question of what they have done, and what they are doing now, to ensure that they are not complicit in Russia’s war crimes or crimes against humanity,” says Tara van Ho.
Fernanda Hopenhaym Cabrera, a member of the UN Working Group on Business and Human Rights, which helps implement and advise on the UNGPs, also emphasises that Rockwool is obliged to investigate its sales in Russia.
“Any company that supplies the arms sector with products or operates in areas of armed conflict should conduct enhanced due diligence”.
“Rockwool now has a responsibility to prevent, mitigate and address the potential or actual human rights violations caused by their business or commercial relationships,” says Fernanda Hopenhaym Cabrera and continues:
“This means that Rockwool has a responsibility to decide whether to implement direct preventive measures, withdraw from the region, abandon commercial relationships, or use its influence in the supply chain to prevent and address adverse human rights impacts, based on the results of its extended due diligence, of course.“
Danwatch and Ekstra Bladet have asked Rockwool whether conditions have been imposed on the company’s Russian distributors – and whether the company itself believes that sales to the Russian military comply with the UNGP guidelines.
Michael Zarin, Head of Communications at Rockwool, declines to answer this question, but writes in an email:
“(…) As we have also previously stated, ROCKWOOL has extensive guidelines when it comes to risk assessments and due diligence.”
Despite repeated requests, Rockwool has not been willing to disclose the results of the risk assessments that the company has allegedly carried out in connection with their business in Russia.
Three of the most advanced submarines in the Russian navy are equipped with ship insulation from the Danish Rockwool Group. These include the submarines “Belgorod” and “Prince Vladimir”, both of which can be equipped with the most modern nuclear weapons in Russia’s arsenal.
This is revealed in official tender documents from Russia, which Danwatch and Ekstra Bladet are in possession of.
“It’s a very interesting finding,” says Professor Michael Petersen, head of the Russia Maritime Studies Institute at the US Naval War College.
With a background in both US military intelligence and the National Security Council, he has for a long time followed the development of Russia’s naval capabilities.
“These submarines are part of Russia’s latest generation of advanced submarines,” he says.
The Russian documents reveal how in June and September 2014 – a few months after Russia’s illegal annexation of the Crimean peninsula – Rockwool’s regular partner, Marine Complex Systems LLC (“MKS”), signed the first contracts for the delivery of more than 15,000 square metres of ship insulation to the state-owned Sevmash shipyard.
The material also reveals that the deliveries of Rockwool insulation of the SeaRox SL 440 brand worth 4.7 million rubles (about 700,000 DKK) were specifically intended for the construction of the two advanced submarines “Belgorod” and “Prince Vladimir”.
Around two years later, in December 2016, MKS again enters into an agreement for supplies to a Russian submarine. This time the contract is with the shipyard Admiralty, which is ordering almost 1,700 square metres of SeaRox SL 400 to build the diesel-powered attack submarine “Velikie Luki”.
Danwatch and Ekstra Bladet have previously revealed how Rockwool’s products have been sold through the distributor MKS to large parts of the Russian navy – including frigates, spy ships and vessels for Putin’s secret navy.
In this connection, the Danish Business Authority has investigated Rockwool and assessed that the company has not violated EU sanctions in Russia.
However, companies like Rockwool are also obliged to comply with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs), which require companies to ensure that they do not contribute to human rights violations at every level of their value chain.
And Tara Van Ho, one of the world’s leading experts on human rights and business at the Human Rights Centre at Essex Law School in the UK, finds it highly problematic that Rockwool’s materials were sold to the Russian military after the annexation of Crimea in 2014.
“When Russia illegally invaded and annexed parts of Ukraine in 2014, companies that supply equipment to the military, whether it be weapons or insulation, should have taken measures to limit their support to the Russian military.”
“Rockwool has the power to impose conditions on their official distributors, and they should have used this power to ensure that distributors comply with human rights standards, including stopping sales to the Russian military. Failure to do so is a breach of Rockwool’s human rights responsibilities under the UN Guiding Principles,” she says.
The submarine “Belgorod” in particular has made headlines around the world. The submarine, which with its 184 metres is the world’s longest, was after testing in the summer of 2022 delivered from the Sevmash shipyard to Russia’s top-secret GUGI military programme at the Arctic port city of Murmansk. GUGI is particularly known for its covert deep-sea missions to map critical infrastructure on the seabed, and the service reports directly to Vladimir Putin and the general staff in Moscow.
According to Michael Petersen, both the Belgorod’s potential armament and experimental design make it a unique submarine that is crucial for Russia in its quest for a head start in the nuclear arms race with the NATO alliance.
“It is designed to carry autonomous, nuclear-powered and unmanned Poseidon submersibles. Poseidon is a strategic nuclear weapon designed to give Russia a strategic advantage by remaining hidden underwater and bypassing Western defenses to carry out a nuclear attack on coastal infrastructure,” he says.
Russian President Putin has publicly praised the Belgorod several times and was also on a live video link from the Kremlin when the submarine was officially launched in 2019.
In 2012, when the second nuclear-powered submarine built with Rockwool, the “Prince Vladimir”, was to be laid at the Sevmash shipyard in the White Sea city of Severodvinsk, Putin personally attended the solemn ceremony. Among other things, he expressed an expectation that the submarine would become “one of the symbols of the Russian armed forces”.
According to Michael Petersen, “Prince Vladimir” – along with the other submarines in the Borei-A class, which is an updated version – forms the backbone of Russia’s sea-based nuclear deterrence strategy.
“It is Russia’s most advanced nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarine. It is armed with 16 Bulava SLBMs (submarine-launched ballistic missiles), each capable of carrying up to 10 nuclear warheads.”
“Once they are at sea, they are hard to locate. In a period of heightened tension leading to potential conflict, Russia is likely to send these submarines to sea, where they will quietly lie in wait for orders to launch nuclear weapons,” he says.
For this reason, according to Michael Petersen, the Borei-A class submarines are a key part of the Russian nuclear weapons programme.
“And they almost certainly will continue to be for the next two decades, at least,” he says.
Danwatch and Ekstra Bladet have asked Rockwool a number of questions about the deliveries to the submarines, including whether they had investigated what the products were to be used for when they were sold to the shipyard Sevmash in 2014, and whether Rockwool makes demands on its distributors about the end use of the products.
However, Michael Zarin, Head of Communications at Rockwool Gruppen, does not answer this question, but writes in an email:
“ROCKWOOL A/S is aware that general insulation products – as well as insulation products for use in civilian marine applications sold through the Russian subsidiaries’ external distributors – have in certain cases been used in Russian naval vessels similar to how these products are used on all types of ships worldwide – including commercial and industrial vessels, as well as cruise ships and yachts. ROCKWOOL products cannot be weaponised or used for military purposes in general. No rock wool products are classified as dual-use.”